The recent win over London rivals Arsenal has re ignited speculation, that amid the furore surrounding the recent plight of Chelsea and lavish spending of Manchester City, that a new contender may come in the form of Tottenham Hotspur to take the Premiership title.
Tottenham, have, since Harry Redknapps appointment when they languished at the bottom of the table, with a mere 2 points from 8 games... gone from strength to strength. Involvement in the Champions league has given them renewed confidence and vigour from playing, and out muscling Inter Milan. Although, it has to be said, that toils of the Champions league, combined with a smaller team (in comparison to the likes of Manchester United etc) may have initially taken its toll, and as such, Spurs have suffered a number of defeats against considered weaker opposition.
Being treated to wins over Inter Milan, and more recently rivals Arsenal, will serve only to wet the appetite of most fans, increasing expectations and ambitions.
Success so far, can generally be apportioned to skill in Redknapp as manager and cumulative effects of a number of world class purchases and revelations. The acquisition of Van der Vaart and extraordinary form of Gareth Bale has helped to catapault them to Champions league group success and put their quest for a top four premier league finish back on track. Gareth Bale, particularly, is considered to be on another planet, with managers falling over themselves to give praise.
Spurs, unlike some of their competitors, namely Chelsea in previous seasons, play some beautiful attacking football, which is so often missing from the game, where managers through defensive tactics and formations often attempt to stifle a games creativity, in order to grind out a result. As such, their appeal may be utilised, and force in not only as a domestic english football team, but in creating an international, globalised brand, which would allow them to compete with the likes of Manchester to acquire a greatly increased fan base, both in SE Asia and USA and tap into a wealth of prosperity.
The rise of Tottenham Hotspur, has with itself, been seen aligned to the fall of Chelsea, whom in my eyes, have taken a step backward this season. Chelsea, have shed a number of players, most notably, 'Deco' and 'Ballack' and the like in reducing their wage bill, without bringing much fresh talent and youth into the set up. They are an ageing team, particularly in comparison with the likes of Arsenal, and as such, there needs to be focus on their Youth team and Scouting network, in identifying talent at an early age, which allows managers and coaches time to mould the player to fit the team. Manchester United, too are not as strong as they once were, with the Glazers in financial difficulties, and loss of Cristiano Ronaldo.
Perhaps, we may well have a new force in English Football, and one which can contend with the traditional top four teams. It is essential for the entertainment value of the premier league, that it remains to be unpredictable and surprising, and thus the rise of Spurs as a possible title contender can only be seen as a positive thing.
joeknight_blog
Providing opinion on the latest headline sport, news and general topical stories in the UK
Sunday, 21 November 2010
Thursday, 18 November 2010
Fifa corruption pair ban:-implications for the UK World Cup 2018 Bid
Fifa executive committee members Amos Adamu and Reynald Temarii have been banned from voting in the 2018/ 2022 World Cup bids.
Contempt has been replaced by fear within the FIFA ranks, as voting members have awoken to the realisation that their power, influence, and position may be under threat...
The corruption which has been unearthed by the Daily Telegraph amongst others, shows that our UK bid, and dream of hosting the World Cup for the first time in half a century, looks set to an uphill battle...or is it? The implications for exposing the individuals within fifa, and the scandal, appeared to be severely damaging for the FA representatives, with many regarding them as unpatriotic, a particular theme amongst those supporting, and involved within the BID itself. This was compounded by the recent plan to continue with the BBC Panorama programme, to be aired only days before the voting is due to be cast.
It may well be argued, whether our Journalists working on behalf of the Daily Telegraph (and looking further back, to the Lord Triesman scandal)..should be applauded and perhaps respected for their attempt to seek the truth, even if it is indeed only for profitable economic gains. We may well, in a strange sense, feel pride, that we have not cowered in to the demands of the FIFA representatives, and responded at whim to their beck and call.
However, it has to be said, that despite these recent developments, our BID remains one of the strongest, having good infrastructure and plentiful supply of stadia, which is in contrast to that of similar bids, primarily Russia, whom suffers from transport issues, and Spain/ Portugal, where their combined efforts is likely to result in confusion, and inconsistencies with the standard achieved between the two nations. Although, it remains to be seen, whether such technical reports, provide anything other than a momentary distraction, and may as such be used in any case to support their preconceived views, in justifying the voting members favoured choices.
The results of the FIFA ethics committee has meant one thing; that is, the UK journalists were right in their assessment of these individuals in question, and as such, this may lead to greater tolerance and sympathy from other voting members, which may if we are lucky swing the vote in our favour.
Contempt has been replaced by fear within the FIFA ranks, as voting members have awoken to the realisation that their power, influence, and position may be under threat...
The corruption which has been unearthed by the Daily Telegraph amongst others, shows that our UK bid, and dream of hosting the World Cup for the first time in half a century, looks set to an uphill battle...or is it? The implications for exposing the individuals within fifa, and the scandal, appeared to be severely damaging for the FA representatives, with many regarding them as unpatriotic, a particular theme amongst those supporting, and involved within the BID itself. This was compounded by the recent plan to continue with the BBC Panorama programme, to be aired only days before the voting is due to be cast.
It may well be argued, whether our Journalists working on behalf of the Daily Telegraph (and looking further back, to the Lord Triesman scandal)..should be applauded and perhaps respected for their attempt to seek the truth, even if it is indeed only for profitable economic gains. We may well, in a strange sense, feel pride, that we have not cowered in to the demands of the FIFA representatives, and responded at whim to their beck and call.
However, it has to be said, that despite these recent developments, our BID remains one of the strongest, having good infrastructure and plentiful supply of stadia, which is in contrast to that of similar bids, primarily Russia, whom suffers from transport issues, and Spain/ Portugal, where their combined efforts is likely to result in confusion, and inconsistencies with the standard achieved between the two nations. Although, it remains to be seen, whether such technical reports, provide anything other than a momentary distraction, and may as such be used in any case to support their preconceived views, in justifying the voting members favoured choices.
The results of the FIFA ethics committee has meant one thing; that is, the UK journalists were right in their assessment of these individuals in question, and as such, this may lead to greater tolerance and sympathy from other voting members, which may if we are lucky swing the vote in our favour.
Monday, 16 August 2010
Eco Towns - The Truman Effect
Eco Towns have been a controversial issue ever since their introduction in 2007. The need to provide sustainable homes, coupled with a gross housing shortage has since amplified calls for their introduction. However, these are prone to adverse social effects, not least with resultant feelings of isolation and disheartenment.
These adverse social effects may be compared to that seen by Jim Carrey in the film “The Truman Show”. This ‘Truman effect’ is thus a cocoon feeling of remoteness, attributed to living a sheltered existence, cut off from the wider national community, similar to that witnessed within the film which was enveloped in a literal bubble.
These towns main attraction are their environmental credentials in achieving a sustainable lifestyle through use of renewable technologies such as solar panels, wind turbines. These green characteristics are very much debateable, as the article Eco Towns- A green myth demonstrates.
A key aspect of such settlements is in creating independent communities, which are to an extent, self-sufficient, attained through localised resources. Although this may help to achieve greater unity and friendships between neighbours, it is likely that without adequate design and planning, greater social ramifications may result. It is incredibly difficult to create a settlement without adequate links to neighbouring towns and cities, for we live in a globalized era of networks and connections. For without such links to adjacent towns and cities occupants may experience negative and disheartening feelings of isolation.
Eco Town planners need to carefully identify these issues if they are to avert a social catastrophe, and accept our continued nomadic nature and need to travel. A key aspect to achieving a Carbon Zero lifestyle, something these settlements aspire for, is in avoiding the use of standard oil based, polluting vehicles. This will put significant pressure on planners and designers alike, resulting in the possibility for limitations or even exclusion of private vehicular use altogether. Consequently, occupants will find it hard to reach friends and family located elsewhere, and may well find themselves in a socially isolated bubble or cocoon, which is hard to break.
Eco Towns share a similar artificial feel to that identified within the “Truman Show”, a result of a general inadequate mix of new modern buildings lacking distinct and unique architectural features combined with a mass of concrete, paving and strategically located trees and vegetation, to give the impression of a highly maintained yet characterless townscape in which to live. As we are highly attuned to our surroundings and environment, repetitive aesthetics will worsen attitudes and perceptions leading to social rejection and overriding dissatisfaction. The advent of travel and with it Globalisation, has heightened our appetite for experiencing new and different surroundings to such an extent, that it is unlikely we will ever be satisfied with remaining confined and restricted to one place for any length of time.
Without appropriate planning and design detailing, Eco Towns may well suffer from the ‘Truman effect’, due to a combination of poor infrastructure connections to existing settlements, and due to localised design criteria, which attempts to limit individuals movements to a small area, thus minimising their carbon footprint.
These adverse social effects may be compared to that seen by Jim Carrey in the film “The Truman Show”. This ‘Truman effect’ is thus a cocoon feeling of remoteness, attributed to living a sheltered existence, cut off from the wider national community, similar to that witnessed within the film which was enveloped in a literal bubble.
These towns main attraction are their environmental credentials in achieving a sustainable lifestyle through use of renewable technologies such as solar panels, wind turbines. These green characteristics are very much debateable, as the article Eco Towns- A green myth demonstrates.
A key aspect of such settlements is in creating independent communities, which are to an extent, self-sufficient, attained through localised resources. Although this may help to achieve greater unity and friendships between neighbours, it is likely that without adequate design and planning, greater social ramifications may result. It is incredibly difficult to create a settlement without adequate links to neighbouring towns and cities, for we live in a globalized era of networks and connections. For without such links to adjacent towns and cities occupants may experience negative and disheartening feelings of isolation.
Eco Town planners need to carefully identify these issues if they are to avert a social catastrophe, and accept our continued nomadic nature and need to travel. A key aspect to achieving a Carbon Zero lifestyle, something these settlements aspire for, is in avoiding the use of standard oil based, polluting vehicles. This will put significant pressure on planners and designers alike, resulting in the possibility for limitations or even exclusion of private vehicular use altogether. Consequently, occupants will find it hard to reach friends and family located elsewhere, and may well find themselves in a socially isolated bubble or cocoon, which is hard to break.
Eco Towns share a similar artificial feel to that identified within the “Truman Show”, a result of a general inadequate mix of new modern buildings lacking distinct and unique architectural features combined with a mass of concrete, paving and strategically located trees and vegetation, to give the impression of a highly maintained yet characterless townscape in which to live. As we are highly attuned to our surroundings and environment, repetitive aesthetics will worsen attitudes and perceptions leading to social rejection and overriding dissatisfaction. The advent of travel and with it Globalisation, has heightened our appetite for experiencing new and different surroundings to such an extent, that it is unlikely we will ever be satisfied with remaining confined and restricted to one place for any length of time.
Without appropriate planning and design detailing, Eco Towns may well suffer from the ‘Truman effect’, due to a combination of poor infrastructure connections to existing settlements, and due to localised design criteria, which attempts to limit individuals movements to a small area, thus minimising their carbon footprint.
Wednesday, 11 August 2010
Wind Turbines - what to consider when installing on rooftops and buildings
Domestic, small scale, roof mounted wind turbines have a huge potential to contribute to localised electricity production, able to be installed on almost all varieties of roofs anywhere; although the degree of benefits associated will vary, depending on both the type chosen and location to which they are sited.
There are however a number of downsides to these small scale micro wind turbines, these are:
The cost effectiveness may be increased through clever use of energy storage from the turbines, such as an electric immersion heating element in a water tank may be used, reducing the impact of intermittent electricity production, and making it more viable a source to meet a home’s energy needs.
Although this article emphasises generally negative aspects of wind turbines, it needs to be appreciated, that presuming that are installed correctly, they can provide signficant cost savings, contributing significantly to Homeowners annual energy bill. More information found on Wind Turbines here.
This article was produced by joeknight at http://www.energy-measures.com/
There are however a number of downsides to these small scale micro wind turbines, these are:
- Vibration - As wind turbine consists of moving parts, this causes a degree of vibration to occur, which if mounted on the roof, is transmitted through to the building below, causing undue stresses.
- Turbulence - Air passing over a building is distorted, resulting in cylindrical air movements. This interferes with the wind turbines normal operation resulting in increased stress and lower energy capture. This can be avoided however, if installed significantly above the roofline; however this is much more complicated and may negate any financial benefits. Or a sophisticated dampening system may be adopted, which separates the turbine from the building structure.
- Safety – Turbines installed on roofs are a particular health and safety hazard, with higher risks associated due to their placement within close proximity to occupants. Their fixings need to be strong enough to withstand high wind levels, and noise levels minimised.
- Efficiency – The majority of residents currently live in built up urban locations, which are sheltered areas, and consequently experience high degree of intermittent wind speeds. The average wind speed in a town or city is generally a lot less than for the same turbine in a rural and open location.
The cost effectiveness may be increased through clever use of energy storage from the turbines, such as an electric immersion heating element in a water tank may be used, reducing the impact of intermittent electricity production, and making it more viable a source to meet a home’s energy needs.
Although this article emphasises generally negative aspects of wind turbines, it needs to be appreciated, that presuming that are installed correctly, they can provide signficant cost savings, contributing significantly to Homeowners annual energy bill. More information found on Wind Turbines here.
This article was produced by joeknight at http://www.energy-measures.com/
The threat of Coal to Oil technology on CO2 emissions
Coal was one of the main contributors to electricity generation, being a driving force through the industrial revolution, and it is only recently within the last few decades or so that we have started to switch from the use of coal to other alternative sources, driven by an increasingly environmentally conscious society. The Coal industry has since collapsed, with few surviving stations within the UK and abroad.
However, Coal is starting to receive attention once again; due to recent technological advances and changing market conditions, which have allowed the process of extracting oil from coal (CTL – Coal to Liquids) to become financially viable.
There are currently still huge stocks of coal still available, which have been previously made redundant. It is estimated that remaining coal supplies may be sufficient to meet energy demands for the next 300 years, (although the accuracy of this is questionable as many nations have not recently assessed their coal reserves). If the coal to oil process were to take off, as a result of escalating oil prices, as currently it is believed that CTL becomes financially viable when oil prices reach in excess of $25 a barrel, it is foreseeable that irrevocable damage would result. This would lead to the point of no return or the tipping point being reached much sooner than anticipated.
Coal to oil extrapolation may never take off, and it is hoped that this is the case, however if the free market conditions were followed, without undue governmental restrictions, it may be likely that the process would be undertaken on a mass scale. Although the use of CTL depends very much on whether there are sufficient remaining coal reserves available to make it a cost effective option.
Promoters of CTL have also made claim that the technology can harness energy from coal in an environmentally friendly way, as contaminants such as sulphur are removed from the coal during the process. Many also point to use of the Carbon Capture and Storage strategy (CCS) as a method of preventing the release of CO2 into the atmosphere, however this is only in the development stage and would suffer from leakage due to unsealed drill holes or by faults and cracks caused by seismic activity.
By refusing to acknowledge the ever present issue of global warming and oil depletion and by desperately trying to retain whatever remaining fossil fuels there are, in an attempt to prolong our high carbon lifestyle will undoubtedly exacerbate the effects of global warming for future generations to come. There needs to be greater emphasis on renewable, environmentally friendly options, if we are to avoid the highly polluting process of coal to oil extraction, which would be seen by many as a step in the wrong direction.
This article was produced by joeknight at http://www.energy-measures.com/
However, Coal is starting to receive attention once again; due to recent technological advances and changing market conditions, which have allowed the process of extracting oil from coal (CTL – Coal to Liquids) to become financially viable.
There are currently still huge stocks of coal still available, which have been previously made redundant. It is estimated that remaining coal supplies may be sufficient to meet energy demands for the next 300 years, (although the accuracy of this is questionable as many nations have not recently assessed their coal reserves). If the coal to oil process were to take off, as a result of escalating oil prices, as currently it is believed that CTL becomes financially viable when oil prices reach in excess of $25 a barrel, it is foreseeable that irrevocable damage would result. This would lead to the point of no return or the tipping point being reached much sooner than anticipated.
Coal to oil extrapolation may never take off, and it is hoped that this is the case, however if the free market conditions were followed, without undue governmental restrictions, it may be likely that the process would be undertaken on a mass scale. Although the use of CTL depends very much on whether there are sufficient remaining coal reserves available to make it a cost effective option.
Promoters of CTL have also made claim that the technology can harness energy from coal in an environmentally friendly way, as contaminants such as sulphur are removed from the coal during the process. Many also point to use of the Carbon Capture and Storage strategy (CCS) as a method of preventing the release of CO2 into the atmosphere, however this is only in the development stage and would suffer from leakage due to unsealed drill holes or by faults and cracks caused by seismic activity.
By refusing to acknowledge the ever present issue of global warming and oil depletion and by desperately trying to retain whatever remaining fossil fuels there are, in an attempt to prolong our high carbon lifestyle will undoubtedly exacerbate the effects of global warming for future generations to come. There needs to be greater emphasis on renewable, environmentally friendly options, if we are to avoid the highly polluting process of coal to oil extraction, which would be seen by many as a step in the wrong direction.
This article was produced by joeknight at http://www.energy-measures.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)